AddiesdiveAD2072
Homage to the Rolex Submariner 5513
about$70
Regular price at addiesdivewatches.com, checked 31 Oct 2026. Marketplace prices change often.
We may earn a commission from these official stores, at no extra cost to you. It never affects scores or rankings. Affiliate disclosure
The Addiesdive AD2072 is a homage to the Rolex Submariner 5513, with a 39 mm case, 1 mm smaller. It uses a quartz movement and is water resistant to 200 m. Its Resemblance Score is 51 out of 100. It costs about $70 at the official store.
Side by side with the original
Compared with reference 5513. Values marked ≈ are estimates, such as a reviewer's measurement.
| Spec | AD2072 | Submariner 5513 (5513) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case diameter | 39 mm | 40 mm | −1 mm |
| Lug-to-lug | 47 mm | ≈ 47 mm | same |
| Thickness | 12 mm | ≈ 14.3 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Lug width | 20 mm | ≈ 20 mm | same |
| Water resistance | 200 m | 200 m | |
| Movement | Quartz | Automatic, 1520 (early examples 1530) | |
| Power reserve | Not published | Not published | |
| Crystal | Mineral, aR coating | Acrylic | |
| Bezel | 96-click bi-directional rotating bezel, Ceramic | Rotating, 60-minute graduated, Aluminium | |
| Case material | 316L stainless steel | Stainless steel | |
| Lume | C3 green lume on hands and markers | Radium on early watches, tritium later | |
| Bracelet | 316L stainless steel three-link bracelet | Oyster, riveted links on early watches | |
| Weight | 131 g | Not published |
- ≈ Submariner 5513, Lug-to-lug: median of 2 agreeing independent measurements (47 mm); the maker does not publish it.
- ≈ Submariner 5513, Thickness: median of 2 agreeing independent measurements (14–14.5 mm); the maker does not publish it.
- ≈ Submariner 5513, Lug width: median of 2 agreeing independent measurements (20 mm); the maker does not publish it.
The original
Rolex
Submariner 5513
Reference 5513, 40 mm, no date (vintage, 1962-1989)
- Case
- 40 mm
- Lug-to-lug
- ≈ 47 mm
- Thickness
- ≈ 14.3 mm
- Water resistance
- 200 m
- Movement
- Automatic, 1520 (early examples 1530)
- List price
- Not published
Why it scores 51
Proportions and movement are computed from specs. Design details and functions are judged from the brand's official images. How we score
Proportions21.4 / 30
- Case diameter8 / 121 mm apart
- Lug-to-lug8 / 8Same size
- Thickness1.4 / 62.3 mm apart
- Lug width4 / 4Same size
Design signatures19.5 / 40
- Black dial with white polygonal luminous hour indices and a printed minute track5 / 10Matte black dial with gilt-toned lume: round plots, a triangle at 12 and bars at 6 and 9, not the polygonal indices of the original.
- Mercedes-style hour hand with sweep seconds hand9 / 9Mercedes-style hour hand with a gold-toned sweep seconds hand in the official images.
- Rotating 60-minute diver's bezel with aluminium insert4 / 8Rotating 60-minute bezel, but bi-directional with 96 clicks and a ceramic insert; the original has an aluminium insert.
- Time-only dial with no date window or cyclops0 / 5Date window at 3 with a partial bar next to it.
- Crown guards on the 40 mm case0 / 5Screw-down crown with no guards in the official images.
- Domed acrylic crystal1.5 / 3Domed bubble-style crystal, but K1 mineral glass with an AR coating, not acrylic.
Functions and materials10 / 20
- Complications4 / 8Time with a date window; the original has no date.
- Bezel action2 / 4Bi-directional 96-click bezel; the original is a rotating 60-minute bezel and its click count is not in the original record.
- Case and bezel materials2 / 4316L steel case with a ceramic bezel insert. The original has an aluminium insert.
- Crystal shape and date window2 / 4Domed K1 mineral crystal with AR coating and no cyclops. The original has a domed acrylic crystal and no cyclops.
Movement type0 / 10
- Movement type0 / 10Different movement type.
What reviewers and owners say
We haven't read enough independent reviews of this model to summarise them yet.
Good
- Thin 12 mm case for a 200 m diver
- Vintage gilt dial with Mercedes hands
- Ceramic bezel with a firm, muted click and no play, per the one reviewer
- Lume that charges quickly and holds well, per the one reviewer
Less good
- Date window, which the vintage original does not have
- Basic bracelet with push pins and gaps opening between links when flexed, per the one reviewer
- Mineral crystal rather than acrylic or sapphire
Compare
Sources
Checked 31 Oct 2026. Every figure on this page comes from one of these pages.